I can’t remember the last time I had such a complete epic
fail as my past week of teaching Grade 5 Maths. It is quite possible that not
one learner obtained any new knowledge this entire week. I might was well have
tried to teach them how to find the derivative. What daunting topic was I
actually trying to teach? Time. Writing down an am or pm time that was said
verbally (like I said twenty past 4 in the afternoon). Writing down an am or pm
time that they saw on a clock face. Writing down an am or pm time that they saw
on a digital 24-clock. Didn’t think it would be that difficult – review really.
Totally wrong.
When they heard a time said aloud verbally, they were
completely confused as to which number was the minutes and which was the hour.
The words “past” and “to” (as in quarter to three or half past eleven) were
simply interchangeable and did not seem to mean different things, or really
they didn’t seem to mean anything at all. While looking at a clock face they
were unable to distinguish between the hour and the minute hand. And when faced
with a digital time, they would simply write in again and then randomly put an
am or pm (or both) after the time. And in the rare case that none of above
offered a challenge, they often wrote something like 2:8pm, forgetting that the
minutes always needed two digits. Worst of all, my real goal for the week was
to have them learn how to calculate the amount of time that had passed between
two given times and to determine the ending time of an event given the start
time and the amount of time that would pass until the end. It didn’t take long
for me to realize that there was a zero percent chance we would get to that at
any point.
So why such an uphill battle? I’m sure that there’s a
different reason for every learner, but I can’t help but think that a big part
of it is the relative importance (or lack of importance) of time in general in
Zulu culture. Some of the problems are similar to those faced in America. Very
few people wear watches any more, so the number of times most of the kids have
seen a clock face is extremely limited. But these are not kids with cell
phones. Most likely there is a cell phone for use by the family, often to send
and receive text messages, but it is not checked regularly for the time of day.
So it is easily possible that the learners could go for days without ever
seeing the time in any fashion. And why should they? Time is of no consequence
here. If it is said that an event will begin at 11am, you are lucky if anyone
arrives by 1pm. What time does the next taxi leave for Durban? When it fills up
with people. When does my class start? When the teacher teaching the class
before me is finished. These are the realities of the culture, so time becomes
just another one of those maths concepts that beg children to ask “When am I
ever going to use this?” I’m not going to lie; it’s frustrating.
And so now the task has doubled – or maybe quadrupled. I
must find a way to make time seem important to kids that don’t have access to
television, so TV program schedules don’t offer much interest and to kids that
aren’t likely to be headed to the airport anytime soon to catch a plane and to
kids that cook by taste and sight rather than recognizing how long something
has been boiling. (I once asked my host sister how long it took to boil a
butternut and she said until it is soft to the touch. When I asked again about
how long that usually takes, she simply said she had no idea, she never thought
to figure that out as it is just even enough to check every once in a while to
see if it is done.) And I must go back to the teaching schedule and find the
time to re-teach this topic. This is one of those moments when a time machine
would really come in handy.
Why is "math" pleural and called "maths"? Interesting.
ReplyDelete